Monday, June 2, 2014

A Wilson-tastic History (Chapter 1)

1920:  The Year of the Six Presidents by David Pietrusza

"Discover a Common Hate" Review & Notes

I recently received the UIL Social Studies 2014-2015 reading, 1920:  The Year of Six Presidents by David Pietrusza.  I've never heard of the author or the book, but right away I was intrigued with the novel.  Perhaps it's my love of evaluating former presidents and congresses' choices that have led to the present day's situation that really pulled me into this book.  The book is primarily focused on the Election of 1920, a year in which six presidents (of course not then-presidents, but men who had been or would soon be presidents) all ran for office and a year in which we're really introduced to the modern election as the results of urbanization and mass media started in.  So far I've read only a few chapters in, but it's a good read and Pietrusza offers a very interesting and entertaining voice that keeps the reading fresh.

This chapter mainly focuses on the then-president, Woodrow Wilson and how his two terms preceding the Election of 1920 really affected it.  Pietrusza uses an interesting tactic to really draw in the reader to the first chapter and the tactic is telling us immediately about Wilson's debilitating stroke in October 1913, describing first his physical fall ("The President of the United States lay bleeding on the bathroom floor.") and his preceding metaphorical, political fall. From there, Pietrusza acknowledges that to get to the election, he must first start further back with Woodrow Wilson to explain how the election was the way it was and so begins to give a short biopic debriefing about Wilson and how to rose to power. 

He was born (December 28, 1856) in the south in Staunton, Virginia, which is important to his political career and his life.  For example, his birthplace more than likely made him fiercely loyal to the Democratic party.  (Pietrusza also says he "had a deep, powerful dose of Anglo-Saxon racism" but doesn't really elaborate on that.)  Apart from his birthplace, he was self-righteous and hard-headed, a fact that Wilson attributed to his "Scotch-blood."  One might wonder, at first, if Wilson's hard-headed stubbornness was a positive attribute; he taught himself to read and he pulled himself through about ten years of college which is really commendable.  It also, presumably, helped him to go from professor to President of Princeton.

Moving away from the question, for a moment, it's important to note that at Wilson's inauguration as university president was a man by the name of Colonel George Harvey.  Harvey was a conservative Democrat who published the North American Review and Harper's Weekly.  He became convinced that Wilson was the leader the Dems needed to regain the White House and therefore went back and published the headline FOR PRESIDENT -- WOODROW WILSON.  This brought Wilson into the national spotlight and into a position of "presidential possibility."

As president of Princeton, his stubbornness started making itself known as a flaw as he used it to justify hard-fought petty squabbles.  In one such argument, his pettiness became overwhelmingly apparent when he said, "Will America tolerate the seclusion of graduate students?" to which Pietrusza answers, "One doubts if America cared then -- or ever -- about such issues..."  (one of the reasons I'm really enjoying this book is because of Pietrusza's voice; it's magnificent).  However, Pietrusza notes that the 'controversies" Wilson faced put him on the fast track from conservative to progressive, especially after winning in the terms of rhetoric but losing in the terms of financing.

So we go back to Harvey.  He thinks that Wilson is a conservative Dem like him and who could possibly help the Democratic party out.  With the help of James Smith, Jr., who is described as a "Democratic boss," Harvey got Wilson into the New Jersey gubernatorial (a word I discovered from this fine book and a word which I love) race of 1910.  When they found out that Wilson wasn't exactly perfect, they still thought he was a safe bet as "[b]oth Harvey and Smith...thought Wilson could be trusted not to attack [Smith's] machine."  He won the governorship.

His first decisive move as a 'Progressive' came with the choosing of the state Senate.  Pietrusza explains that during Wilson's time in office, the "Sixteenth" Amendment (I believe this was a typo; it's actually the Seventeenth) had not been enacted yet so the state legislators appointed the state senators.  New Jersey held it's first advisory primary and James E. Martine, a man that was seen as a political joke with nicknames like "Farmer Jim," was chosen.  Smith wanted back into the Senate and asked Wilson to rally for him instead of Martine, yet Wilson refused, saying, "It was a victory of "Progressives" or both parties, who are determined to live no longer under either of the political organizations that controlled the two parties of the State..."

As his three-year term was coming to an end, Wilson started making a grab for the White House and found himself moving more and more left.  Becoming less conservative, he turned to his nasty habit of throwing his friends out after they had fulfilled their usefulness; he threw Harvey and Smith out of his life and befriended another influential and important man.  This man went by the name of Colonel Edward Mandell House, a rather shadowy man who happened to be very good at politics.  He helped to elect four different Texas governors but found himself bored so he found himself too making a grab for the White House.  He found Wilson to be the perfect pawn.  (It's worth pointing out that House had anonymously written a book called Phillip Dru:  Administrator, about a dictator who implemented his agenda; it is said Wilson read this book.)

Regardless of how shady House was, he helped Wilson make it to the top.  He won the nomination, though barely and after forty-six ballots, but he won and put Thomas R. Marshall as his vice president.  (To this, Marshall said, "Once there were two brothers.  One ran away to sea, the other was elected vice president.  Neither one of them were heard from again.")  Wilson won the election -- well, obviously.

The first half of Wilson's presidency seems to be something great.  He did many things including

Then, in August of 1914, his presidency (and life) began to spiral downward.  August 1, 1914, found the Germans declaring war on the Russians, and August 6, 1914, found Ellen Wilson, Woodrow's wife, dead from Bright's Disease.  Wilson grieved and this affected his duties.  Then, he met and fell in love with Edith Galt, another widower; the love was whirlwind and astounded and worried Wilson's political companions who did not approve.  They tried to make the romance disappear, specifically by threatening to release compromising letters from an alleged affair Wilson had on his late wife, Ellen.  These didn't get out and Edith stayed steady by Wilson's side (they were married in October of 1915).

Despite this downward spiral, Wilson campaigned for another term with the slogan "He kept us out of war," and then promptly, a month after being sworn in, went to war.  This is for a variety of reasons, from the sinking of an American ship by Germans to the Zimmerman Note to Wilson believing it was his job to "make the world safe for democracy."  America was largely unscathed (war declared in March, troops on French soil in June, fighting in November) and when the war ended on November 11, 1918, Wilson found himself ready to launch his own war.

--

This was long, I apologize.  The tl;dr version of this is basically:

A lot of history about Wilson.  Where he's from, where he went to school, becoming a professor and later the president over Princeton, to becoming President of the U.S. in one of its most tumultuous times.  It's a great book and David Pietrusza issues a strong and down-to-earth voice that really helps a reader keep focus.  

I'm adding links to people's (and event's) Wikipedia pages where you can read up more and find other sources for this stuff.  I recommend it!  I also might do some of my own research and try to write.  

Monday, May 26, 2014

Reviews and Notes

I haven't used this blog very much, but I figure that since I need to keep notes on a book I'm reading, I could offer up some review.  There are also some books/plays I want to read that I might comment on here.


  1. Oedipus
  2. Hamlet
  3. Catcher in the Rye
  4. Jane Eyre
  5. Things Fall Apart
And some others, hopefully.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Re: Honesty About Eating Disorders by Onision | A Blog Post From a Recovering Anorexic

Good morning/afternoon/evening/night, my dear Bloggers,

The title is a mouthful, isn't it?  This is my first blog post on this blog and I wish it wasn't about something so stupid, but here I am.

Today I want to talk about and reply to Onision's video "Honest About Eating Disorders."  First, I want to clarify as to why I'm responding to a three year old video made by a guy who probably won't read this or pay attention at all to my differing 'opinion.'

I recently found this video.  I watched it and it hurt my brain with it's disturbing ignorance.  If you watch the video, you will find that Onision has no clue what in the world he's talking about.  By replying and discussing the video, I know I am helping him to get more hits.  This is what I want because I want people to go to his video and see just how ignorant this guy is, especially since he's popular, amassing around 200K subscribers.

Now that that's cleared up, without further adieu - Onision.

"So I shouldn't say anything about your weight problem because I have never had a weight problem myself."

Exactly!  Good job figuring that one out, hun.  So the video is over, we can move on ri-

"Um, okay, so I shouldn't say anything about pedophilia because I've never been a pedophile myself.  I shouldn't say anything about rape becase I've never been a rapist myself.  Utterly weak and pathetic argument."

Stop.  I'll excuse the fact that your sentence was incomplete because it was spoken.  However, I won't excuse the sentence itself.

I mean, come on; thirty seconds into this video and you're already missing the point.

You can't talk about being raped unless you've been raped.  You can't talk about being molested unless you've been molested.  Likewise, you can't talk about having a 'weight problem' - by the way, Onision, darling, the term is 'eating disorder' because it's...you know, a disorder - unless you've had one!

The stuff you mentioned to 'break' the argument - "I can't talk about pedophilia because I'm not a pedophile, I can't talk about rape because I've never raped" - is not even on par with the first thing you said.  If you had said, "So I can't talk about bullying someone into an eating disorder because I haven't done that," and then followed up with your little 'counter-arguments' then maybe it would have made sense.  This just does not.

"That's just my opinion.  If you don't like my opinion, just, I mean, why are you hanging around here?  Just go away.  Like seriously.  You don't have to be subscribed to me."

Honey, darling...dear.  I'm not subscribed.  Nor have I ever been at any point or time, thank goodness.  You do know that you've made this video...how do you say, public?  You know, public to the 360 million people in the world who use the goddamn internet?  I wasn't looking for this video, this video found me.

"I think being fat and being anorexic, etc., is ridiculous."

Being anorexic is ridiculous.  It is ridiculous people like you can say 'being fat is ridiculous' and then wonder why people develop eating disorders.  You're telling the viewership of this video that 'being fat is ridiculous' which just perpetuates the idea that being fat is bad.

"The reason I say this is not because the actual condition to me is ridiculous, it's the mentality.  It's the mentality that, "Oh I can't control it.  This is just impossible to overcome.  Woe is me."

You, uh...you do understand, my darling Onision that that is the disorder?  There is something in your brain telling you how worthless you are if you eat, how worthless you are if you eat, how you're worthless if you don't starve or purge.  Get off your damn high horse.

"Oh look at those poor anorexics!  Woe is me, woe is me!  Why can't they just eat properly like me, oh ho ho; its not like its a mental disorder or anything, it's a weight problem."

Anorexia is very difficult to overcome.  Even now when I have a loving, caring boyfriend who makes me feel like the most beautiful, important girl in the entire world, I struggle.  I look at the mirror and I want to gag because I hate myself so much.  I don't count calories anymore, but I still hate myself when I eat.  I still hate the feeling of a full belly.  It is difficult to overcome and it feels like you can't overcome it because there is that constant voice and nagging in your head.

Just a quick note:  I know I'm only really talking about anorexia here because that's what I've dealt with and had experience in, but come on man.  Binge Eating Disorder is a real disease.  Educate yourself, you uncultured swine.  These people don't have control over how much or how often they eat.

"It's utterly pathetic because there are so many people in this world who are desperate for food, who are borderline dying because of their lack of food.  And here you are stuffing your face or starving yourself intentionally.  Utterly pathetic."

What is with this atrocious victim blaming?  You said earlier that being fat is ridiculous, which, as I said earlier is just perpetuating that being fat is bad.  That makes people afraid of being fat.  What makes you fat?  Food!  Jesus christ, stop making someone feel bad because of a disorder in their minds.  They can't control it either way.

I remember at the pinnacle of my anorexia/bulimia, my mom had bought my some breakfast.  I remember sitting at the table staring at the bowl, wanting it, tasting it...but I couldn't eat it.  That voice was whispering how strong I had been, how in control I had been for starving myself.  If I broke it I was just utterly worthless.  And then I ate the entire bowl, ran to the drawer, opened a bag of M&Ms and ate half the bag.  My stomach felt like it was going to burst.  Then I threw it ALL UP.  So fuck you, Onision, it's not a matter you can control.

"Now, the fat people that accept themselves and the fat people that aren't complaining, great.  I'm completely cool with them.  But the fat people that are, "Oh, I can't control myself" and then they shove a candy bar in their mouth, it's pathetic."

No.  Like I said, it's something you can't control.  Sometimes you're sad or depressed and eating is a renowned method of dealing with stress or depression.  It's not the best one, but it is one.  You can get to a point where it gets out of control.

"And I really hope that you guys do accept that some people have opinions in this world that don't perfectly align with yours."

I accept other people's opinions.

I accept your right to state your opinions, however ignorant they may be.

But I also accept my right to reply and discuss your video and to state that, in my opinion, you're a really shitty, uneducated person who is perched far too high on his damn horse.

Also, just a little observation here, but why are you so afraid of backlash?  Is there still a rational person inside of you that says, "Hey, maybe this isn't exactly a good opinion.  Maybe it's even a little dumb."  Is there?  I hope so.

Also, "people have opinions...that don't perfectly align with yours," so why do you tell people that have differing opinions to "just go away?"  That's rather odd, Onision, that you can't take some differing opinions while pleading that yours is respected.

Just go do something else Onision.  Really.

- Sarah

--
Link to video.